Wetenschappelijke geschiedenis van Biofotonen

---

dfsfssfd

References

1. 1D. AverbeckLow-dose non-targeted effects and mitochondrial controlInt J Mol Sci, 24 (14) (2023), Article 11460, 10.3390/ijms241411460View at publisherView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
2. 2United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic RadiationSources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) 2020/2021 Report, Volume IIUnited Nations, New York (2022)Google Scholar
3. 3L.E. FeinendegenEvidence for beneficial low level radiation effects and radiation hormesisBr J Radiol, 78 (925) (2015), pp. 3-7, 10.1259/bjr/63353075Google Scholar
4. 4E.J. Calabrese, G. Dhawan, R. Kapoor, et al.What is hormesis and its relevance to healthy aging and longevity?Biogerontology, 16 (2015), pp. 693-707, 10.1007/s10522-015-9601-0View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
5. 5Y.S. Lau, M.T. Chew, A. Alqahtani, et al.Low dose ionising radiation-induced hormesis: therapeutic implications to human healthAppl Sci, 11 (19) (2021), p. 8909, 10.3390/app11198909View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
6. 6S. Jin, H. Jiang, L. CaiNew understanding of the low-dose radiation-induced hormesisRadiat Med Prot, 1 (1) (2020), pp. 2-6, 10.1016/j.radmp.2020.01.004View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
7. 7F.R. Tang, W.K. LokeMolecular mechanisms of low dose ionizing radiation-induced hormesis, adaptive responses, radioresistance, bystander effects, and genomic instabilityInt J Radiat Biol, 91 (1) (2015), pp. 13-27, 10.3109/09553002.2014.937510View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
8. 8A. Dawood, C. Mothersill, C. SeymourLow dose ionizing radiation and the immune response: what is the role of non-targeted effects?Int J Radiat Biol, 97 (10) (2021), pp. 1368-1382, 10.1080/09553002.2021.1962572View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
9. 9N. Franco, J. Lamartine, V. Frouin, et al.Low-dose exposure to gamma rays induces specific gene regulations in normal human keratinocytesRadiat Res, 163 (6) (2005), pp. 623-635, 10.1667/rr3391View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
10. 10R.L. Warters, A.T. Packard, G.F. Kramer, et al.Differential gene expression in primary human skin keratinocytes and fibroblasts in response to ionizing radiationRadiat Res, 172 (1) (2009), pp. 82-95, 10.1667/RR1677.1View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
11. 11M. Belli, M.A. TabocchiniIonizing radiation-induced epigenetic modifications and their relevance to radiation protectionInt J Mol Sci, 21 (17) (2020), p. 5993, 10.3390/ijms21175993Google Scholar
12. 12B. Sampadi, L.H.F. Mullenders, H. VrielingLow and high doses of ionizing radiation evoke discrete global (phospho)proteome responsesDNA Repair, 113 (2022), Article 103305, 10.1016/j.dnarep.2022.103305View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
13. 13K. Rothkamm, M. LöbrichEvidence for a lack of DNA double-strand break repair in human cells exposed to very low x-ray dosesProc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 100 (9) (2003), pp. 5057-5062, 10.1073/pnas.0830918100View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
14. 14D. AverbeckNon-targeted effects as a paradigm breaking evidenceMutat Res, 687 (1-2) (2010), pp. 7-12, 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2010.01.004View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
15. 15E.I. Azzam, S.M. de Toledo, T. Gooding, et al.Intercellular communication is involved in the bystander regulation of gene expression in human cells exposed to very low fluences of alpha particlesRadiat Res, 150 (5) (1998), pp. 497-504CrossrefView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
16. 16M.H. Barcellos-Hoff, A.L. BrooksExtracellular signaling through the microenvironment: a hypothesis relating carcinogenesis, bystander effects, and genomic instabilityRadiat Res, 156 (5 Pt 2) (2001), pp. 618-627, 10.1667/0033-7587(2001)156[0618:esttma]2.0.co;2View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
17. 17P. Maguire, C. Mothersill, C. Seymour, et al.Medium from irradiated cells induces dose-dependent mitochondrial changes and BCL2 responses in unirradiated human keratinocytesRadiat Res, 163 (4) (2005), pp. 384-390, 10.1667/rr3325View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
18. 18C. Mothersill, T.D. Stamato, M.L. Perez, et al.Involvement of energy metabolism in the production of ‘bystander effects’ by radiationBr J Cancer, 82 (10) (2000), pp. 1740-1746, 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1109View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
19. 19F.M. Lyng, C.B. Seymour, C. MothersillProduction of a signal by irradiated cells which leads to a response in unirradiated cells characteristic of initiation of apoptosisBr J Cancer, 83 (9) (2000), pp. 1223-1230, 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1433View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
20. 20M. Buonanno, S.M. de Toledo, D. Pain, et al.Long-term consequences of radiation-induced bystander effects depend on radiation quality and dose and correlate with oxidative stressRadiat Res, 175 (4) (2011), pp. 405-415, 10.1667/RR2461.1View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
21. 21C. Shao, F.M. Lyng, M. Folkard, et al.Calcium fluxes modulate the radiation-induced bystander responses in targeted glioma and fibroblast cellsRadiat Res, 166 (3) (2006), pp. 479-487, 10.1667/RR3600.1View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
22. 22W.F. MorganIs there a common mechanism underlying genomic instability, bystander effects and other nontargeted effects of exposure to ionizing radiation?Oncogene, 22 (45) (2003), pp. 7094-7099, 10.1038/sj.onc.1206992View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
23. 23G.J. Kim, K. Chandrasekaran, W.F. MorganMitochondrial dysfunction, persistently elevated levels of reactive oxygen species and radiation-induced genomic instability: a reviewMutagenesis, 21 (6) (2006), pp. 361-367, 10.1093/mutage/gel048View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
24. 24G.J. Kim, G.M. Fiskum, W.F. MorganA role for mitochondrial dysfunction in perpetuating radiation-induced genomic instabilityCancer Res, 66 (21) (2006), pp. 10377-10383, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3036View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
25. 25C. Mothersill, T.D. Stamato, M.L. Perez, et al.Involvement of energy metabolism in the production of ‘bystander effects’ by radiationBr J Cancer, 82 (10) (2000), pp. 1740-1746, 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1109View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
26. 26M. Mancuso, E. Pasquali, S. Leonardi, et al.Role of connexin43 and ATP in long-range bystander radiation damage and oncogenesis in vivoOncogene, 30 (45) (2011), pp. 4601-4608, 10.1038/onc.2011.176View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
27. 27C. Kong, W. Song, T. FuSystemic inflammatory response syndrome is triggered by mitochondrial damageMol Med Rep, 25 (4) (2022), p. 147, 10.3892/mmr.2022.12663submitted for publicationView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
28. 28J.L. Redpath, D. Liang, T.H. Taylor, et al.The shape of the dose-response curve for radiation-induced neoplastic transformation in vitro: evidence for an adaptive response against neoplastic transformation at low doses of low-LET radiationRadiat Res, 156 (6) (2001), pp. 700-707, 10.1667/0033-7587(2001)156[0700:tsotdr]2.0.co;2View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
29. 29L.A. Ryan, C.B. Seymour, M.C. Joiner, et al.Radiation-induced adaptive response is not seen in cell lines showing a bystander effect but is seen in lines showing HRS/IRR responseInt J Radiat Biol, 85 (1) (2009), pp. 87-95, 10.1080/09553000802635062View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
30. 30D.I. Portess, G. Bauer, M.A. Hill, et al.Low-dose irradiation of nontransformed cells stimulates the selective removal of precancerous cells via intercellular induction of apoptosisCancer Res, 67 (3) (2007), pp. 1246-1253, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-2985View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
31. 31S. Pazzaglia, B. Tanno, I. De Stefano, et al.Micro-RNA and proteomic profiles of plasma-derived exosomes from irradiated mice reveal molecular changes preventing apoptosis in neonatal cerebellumInt J Mol Sci, 23 (4) (2022), p. 2169, 10.3390/ijms23042169View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
32. 32S. Pazzaglia, M. Eidemüller, K. Lumniczky, et al.Out-of-field effects: lessons learned from partial body exposureRadiat Environ Biophys, 61 (4) (2022), pp. 485-504, 10.1007/s00411-022-00988-0View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
33. 33T.H. Habets, T. Oth, A.W. Houben, et al.Fractionated radiotherapy with 3 x 8 Gy induces systemic anti-tumour responses and abscopal tumour inhibition without modulating the humoral anti-tumour responsePLoS One, 11 (7) (2016), Article e0159515, 10.1371/journal.pone.0159515View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
34. 34S. Diegeler, C.E. HellwegIntercellular communication of tumor cells and immune cells after exposure to different ionizing radiation qualitiesFront Immunol, 8 (2017), p. 664, 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00664View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
35. 35F. Rödel, B. Frey, U. Gaipl, et al.Modulation of inflammatory immune reactions by low-dose ionizing radiation: molecular mechanisms and clinical applicationCurr Med Chem, 19 (12) (2012), pp. 1741-1750, 10.2174/092986712800099866View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
36. 36B. Tanno, F. Novelli, S. Leonardi, et al.MiRNA-mediated fibrosis in the out-of-target heart following partial-body irradiationCancers, 14 (14) (2022), p. 3463, 10.3390/cancers14143463View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
37. 37E.J. Calabrese, L.A. BaldwinDefining hormesisHum Exp Toxicol, 21 (2) (2002), pp. 91-97, 10.1191/0960327102ht217oaView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
38. 38E.J. CalabreseLinear non-threshold (LNT) fails numerous toxicological stress tests: implications for continued policy useChem Biol Interact, 365 (2022), Article 110064, 10.1016/j.cbi.2022.110064View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
39. 39E. Agathokleous, E.J. CalabreseHormesis: a general biological principleChem Res Toxicol, 35 (4) (2022), pp. 547-549, 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.2c00032View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
40. 40M.M. Sthijns, A.R. Weseler, A. Bast, et al.Time in redox adaptation processes: from evolution to hormesisInt J Mol Sci, 17 (10) (2016), p. 1649, 10.3390/ijms17101649View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
41. 41E.J. Calabrese, G. Dhawan, R. Kapoor, et al.HORMESIS: a fundamental concept with widespread biological and biomedical applicationsGerontology, 62 (5) (2016), pp. 530-535, 10.1159/000441520View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
42. 42R.E. MitchelLow doses of radiation are protective in vitro and in vivo: evolutionary originsDose Response, 4 (2) (2006), pp. 75-90, 10.2203/dose-response.04-002.MitchelGoogle Scholar
43. 43G. Olivieri, J. Bodycote, S. WolffAdaptive response of human lymphocytes to low concentrations of radioactive thymidineScience, 223 (4636) (1984), pp. 594-597, 10.1126/science.6695170View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
44. 44S. Wolff, V. Afzal, J.K. Wiencke, et al.Human lymphocytes exposed to low doses of ionizing radiations become refractory to high doses of radiation as well as to chemical mutagens that induce double-strand breaks in DNAInt J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med, 53 (1) (1988), pp. 39-47, 10.1080/09553008814550401View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
45. 45S. WolffAspects of the adaptive response to very low doses of radiation and other agentsMutat Res, 358 (2) (1996), pp. 135-142, 10.1016/s0027-5107(96)00114-5View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
46. 46S. Su, S. Zhou, C. WenEvidence for adaptive response in a molecular epidemiological study of the inhabitants of a high background-radiation area of Yangjiang, ChinaHealth Phys, 115 (2) (2018), pp. 227-234, 10.1097/HP.0000000000000860Google Scholar
47. 47E.I. Azzam, S.M. de Toledo, T. Gooding, et al.Intercellular communication is involved in the bystander regulation of gene expression in human cells exposed to very low fluences of alpha particlesRadiat Res, 150 (5) (1998), pp. 497-504CrossrefView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
48. 48J.R. Whiteside, T.J. McMillanA bystander effect is induced in human cells treated with UVA radiation but not UVB radiationRadiat Res, 171 (2) (2009), pp. 204-211, 10.1667/RR1508.1View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
49. 49J.R. Whiteside, S.L. Allinson, T.J. McMillanTimeframes of UVA-induced bystander effects in human keratinocytesPhotochem Photobiol, 87 (2) (2011), pp. 435-440, 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2010.00881.xView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
50. 50B.E. Lehnert, E.H. Goodwin, A. DeshpandeExtracellular factor(s) following exposure to alpha particles can cause sister chromatid exchanges in normal human cellsCancer Res, 57 (11) (1997), pp. 2164-2171Cancer Res. 2003;63(6):1439View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
51. 51K.M. Prise, O.V. Belyakov, M. Folkard, et al.Studies of bystander effects in human fibroblasts using a charged particle microbeamInt J Radiat Biol, 74 (6) (1998), pp. 793-798, 10.1080/095530098141087View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
52. 52F.M. Lyng, C.B. Seymour, C. MothersillInitiation of apoptosis in cells exposed to medium from the progeny of irradiated cells: a possible mechanism for bystander-induced genomic instability?Radiat Res, 157 (4) (2002), pp. 365-370, 10.1667/0033-7587(2002)157[0365:ioaice]2.0.co;2View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
53. 53C. Mothersill, A. Rusin, C. Fernandez-Palomo, et al.History of bystander effects research 1905-present; what is in a name?Int J Radiat Biol, 94 (8) (2018), pp. 696-707, 10.1080/09553002.2017.1398436View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
54. 54Y. Du, S. Du, L. Liu, et al.Radiation-induced bystander effect can be transmitted through exosomes using miRNAs as effector moleculesRadiat Res, 194 (1) (2020), pp. 89-100, 10.1667/RADE-20-00019.1View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
55. 55C. Mothersill, C.B. SeymourRadiation-induced bystander effects–implications for cancerNat Rev Cancer, 4 (2) (2004), pp. 158-164, 10.1038/nrc1277View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
56. 56R. Yahyapour, E. Motevaseli, A. Rezaeyan, et al.Mechanisms of radiation bystander and non-targeted effects: implications to radiation carcinogenesis and radiotherapyCurr Radiopharm, 11 (1) (2018), pp. 34-45, 10.2174/1874471011666171229123130View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
57. 57M.V. TrushinDistant non-chemical communication in various biological systemsRiv Biol, 97 (3) (2004), pp. 409-442View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
58. 58M.V. TrushinThe possible role of electromagnetic fields in bacterial communicationJ Microbiol Immunol Infect, 36 (3) (2003), pp. 153-160View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
59. 59M. Cifra, J.Z. Fields, A. FarhadiElectromagnetic cellular interactionsProg Biophys Mol Biol, 105 (3) (2011), pp. 223-246, 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2010.07.003View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
60. 60A. Farhadi, C. Forsyth, A. Banan, et al.Evidence for non-chemical, non-electrical intercellular signaling in intestinal epithelial cellsBioelectrochemistry, 71 (2) (2007), pp. 142-148, 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2007.03.001View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
61. 61V.V. Chaban, T. Cho, C.B. Reid, et al.Physically disconnected non-diffusible cell-to-cell communication between neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y and DRG primary sensory neuronsAm J Transl Res, 5 (1) (2013), pp. 69-79View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
62. 62F. Scholkmann, D. Fels, M. CifraNon-chemical and non-contact cell-to-cell communication: a short reviewAm J Transl Res, 5 (6) (2013), pp. 586-593View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
63. 63S.K. Dhiman, P. GallandEffects of weak static magnetic fields on the gene expression of seedlings of Arabidopsis thalianaJ Plant Physiol, 231 (2018), pp. 9-18, 10.1016/j.jplph.2018.08.016View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
64. 64M. BischofBiophotons- the light in our cellsJ Optometric Photother (2005), pp. 1-5CrossrefView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
65. 65H.J. NiggliUltraweak photons emitted by cells: biophotonsJ Photochem Photobiol, B, 14 (1-2) (1992), pp. 144-146, 10.1016/1011-1344(92)85090-hView PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
66. 66K. CreathA look at some systemic properties of self-bioluminescent emissionProc SPIE, 7057 (2008), pp. 705708-705711CrossrefView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
67. 67R.P. Bajpai, E.P. Van Wijk, R. Van Wijk, et al.Attributes characterizing spontaneous ultra-weak photon signals of human subjectsJ Photochem Photobiol, B, 129 (2013), pp. 6-16, 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2013.09.002View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
68. 68J. Cohen, T.K. Nguyen, D.R. Chettle, et al.Quantifying biophoton emissions from human cells directly exposed to low-dose gamma radiationDose Response, 18 (2) (2020), Article 1559325820926763, 10.1177/1559325820926763Google Scholar
69. 69M. Le, C.E. Mothersill, C.B. Seymour, et al.Factors affecting ultraviolet-A photon emission from β-irradiated human keratinocyte cellsPhys Med Biol, 60 (16) (2015), pp. 6371-6389, 10.1088/0031-9155/60/16/6371View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
70. 70C. Mothersill, C. Seymour, A. Armstrong, et al.Ultra-violet light emission from HPV-G cells irradiated with low LET radiation from ⁹⁰Y; Consequences for radiation induced bystander effectsDose Response, 11 (4) (2013), pp. 498-516, 10.2203/dose-response.12-048(Ahmad)Google Scholar
71. 71C.L. RossEnergy medicine: Current status and future perspectivesGlob Adv Health Med, 27 (2019), Article 8:2164956119831221, 10.1177/2164956119831221Google Scholar
72. 72J. Slawinski, A. Ezzahir, M. Godlewski, et al.Stress-induced photon emission from perturbed organismsExperientia, 48 (11-12) (1992), pp. 1041-1058, 10.1007/BF01947992View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
73. 73P. Xu, M. Wang, W.M. Song, et al.The landscape of human tissue and cell type specific expression and co-regulation of senescence genesMol Neurodegener, 17 (1) (2022), p. 5, 10.1186/s13024-021-00507-7View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
74. 74G.G. Powathil, A.J. Munro, M.A. Chaplain, et al.Bystander effects and their implications for clinical radiation therapy: insights from multiscale in silico experimentsJ Theor Biol, 401 (2016), pp. 1-14, 10.1016/j.jtbi.2016.04.010View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
75. 75R.B. Naumann, N.S. Sabounchi, J. Kuhlberg, et al.Simulating congestion pricing policy impacts on pedestrian safety using a system dynamics approachAccid Anal Prev, 171 (2022), Article 106662, 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106662View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
76. 76A.G. GurwitschDie Vererbung als VerwirklichungsvorgangBiol Zent, 32 (1912), pp. 458-486Google Scholar
77. 77A. GurwitschPhysikalisches über mitogenetische StrahlenArchiv f mikr Anat u Entwicklungsmechanik, 103 (3-4) (1924), pp. 490-498, 10.1007/BF02107498View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
78. 78A.A. GurwitschA historical review of the problem of mitogenetic radiationExperientia, 44 (7) (1988), pp. 545-550, 10.1007/BF01953301View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
79. 79W.J. StempellInvisible radiations of the living organismMitogenetic radiations. Die Unsichtbare Strahlung Der Lebewesen (1932), p. 24Google Scholar
80. 80I. Volodyaev, L.V. BeloussovRevisiting the mitogenetic effect of ultra-weak photon emissionFront Physiol, 6 (2015), p. 241, 10.3389/fphys.2015.00241View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
81. 81O. Rahn, S.W. BarnesInvisible radiations of organismsProtoplasma – Monographien, Borntraeger, Berlin (1936)Google Scholar
82. 82GurvichThe problem of mitogenic radiation as an aspect of molecular biology(1968)Google Scholar
83. 83E.V. Naumova, A.E. Naumova, D.A. Isaev, et al.Historical review of early researches on mitogenetic radiation: from discovery to cancer diagnosticsJ Biomed Photon Eng, 4 (4) (2018), p. 31, 10.18287/JBPE18.04.040201Google Scholar
84. 84P. Pospíšil, A. Prasad, M. RácRole of reactive oxygen species in ultra-weak photon emission in biological systemsJ Photochem Photobiol, B, 139 (2014), pp. 11-23, 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2014.02.008View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
85. 85B. Ruth, F.A. PoppExperimentelle Untersuchungen zur ultraschwachen Photonenemission biologischer SystemeZ Naturforsch C Biosci, 31 (11-12) (1976), pp. 741-745CrossrefView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
86. 86F.A. Popp, W. Nagl, K.H. Li, et al.Biophoton emission. New evidence for coherence and DNA as sourceCell Biophys, 6 (1) (1984), pp. 33-52, 10.1007/BF02788579View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
87. 87F.A. PoppProperties of biophotons and their theoretical implicationsIndian J Exp Biol, 41 (5) (2003), pp. 391-402View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
88. 88B. Devaraj, M. Usa, H. InabaBiophotons: ultraweak light emission from living systemsCurr Opin Solid State Mater Sci, 2 (2) (1997), pp. 188-193, 10.1016/S1359-0286(97)80064-2View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
89. 89J.J. ChangPhysical properties of biophotons and their biological functionsIndian J Exp Biol, 46 (5) (2008), pp. 371-377View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
90. 90S. Das, K.U. Rehman, G.Y. Zhuo, et al.Spontaneous loss versus stimulation gain in pump-probe microscopy: a proof of concept demonstrationJ Biomed Opt, 25 (3) (2020), pp. 1-11, 10.1117/1.JBO.25.3.036501Google Scholar
91. 91R. Van WijkLight in shaping lifeIn: Biophotons in Biology and Medicine, Boeken Service, Amsterdam, Netherlands (2014)Google Scholar
92. 92R. Van Wijk, E.P. Van Wijk, F.A. Wiegant, et al.Free radicals and low-level photon emission in human pathogenesis: state of the artIndian J Exp Biol, 46 (5) (2008), pp. 273-309View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
93. 93E. Cadenas, A. Boveris, B. ChanceLow-level chemiluminescence of bovine heart submitochondrial particlesBiochem J, 186 (3) (1980), pp. 659-667, 10.1042/bj1860659View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
94. 94H.J. Niggli, S. Tudisco, L. Lanzanò, et al.Laser-ultraviolet-A induced ultra weak photon emission in human skin cells: a biophotonic comparison between keratinocytes and fibroblastsIndian J Exp Biol, 46 (5) (2008), pp. 358-363Google Scholar
95. 95H.J. NiggliThe cell nucleus of cultured melanoma cells as a source of ultraweak photon emissionNaturwissenschaften, 83 (1) (1996), pp. 41-44, 10.1007/BF01139311View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
96. 96B. Devaraj, R.Q. Scott, P. Roschger, et al.Ultraweak light emission from rat liver nucleiPhotochem Photobiol, 54 (2) (1991), pp. 289-293, 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1991.tb02018.xView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
97. 97M. Kobayashi, K. Sasaki, M. Enomoto, et al.Highly sensitive determination of transient generation of biophotons during hypersensitive response to cucumber mosaic virus in cowpeaJ Exp Bot, 58 (3) (2007), pp. 465-472, 10.1093/jxb/erl215View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
98. 98J.J. Chang, J. Fisch, F.A. PoppBiophotonsSpringer, Berlin (1998), pp. 323-339, 10.1007/978-94-017-0928-6_21View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
99. 99H. Schwabl, H. KlimaSpontaneous ultraweak photon emission from biological systems and the endogenous light fieldForsch Komplementarmed Klass Naturheilkd, 12 (2) (2005), pp. 84-89, 10.1159/000083960View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
100. 100R. Hammerschlag, M. Levin, R. McCraty, et al.Biofield physiology: a Framework for an emerging DisciplineGlob Adv Health Med, 4 (2015), pp. 35-41, 10.7453/gahmj.2015.015.supplView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
101. 101W.P. MeiOn the Biological nature of biophotonsBioelectrodynamics and Biocommunication (1994), pp. 269-291, 10.1142/9789814503822_0011Google Scholar
102. 102O. Kučera, M. CifraCell-to-cell signaling through light: just a ghost of chance?Cell Commun Signal, 11 (2013), p. 87, 10.1186/1478-811X-11-87View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
103. 103D. FelsCellular communication through lightPLoS One, 4 (4) (2009), p. 5086, 10.1371/journal.pone.0005086Google Scholar
104. 104R.N. Tilbury, T.I. QuickendenSpectral and time dependence studies of the ultraweak bioluminrescence emitted by the bacterium Escherichia coliPhotochem Photobiol, 47 (1) (1988), pp. 145-150, 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1988.tb02704.xView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
105. 105R.N. TilburyThe effect of stress factors on the spontaneous photon emission from microorganismsExperientia, 48 (11-12) (1992), pp. 1030-1041, 10.1007/BF01947991View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
106. 106R.N. Tilbury, T.I. QuickendenLuminescence from the yeast Candida utilis and comparisons across three generaJ Biolumin Chemilumin, 7 (4) (1992), pp. 245-253, 10.1002/bio.1170070404View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
107. 107M. Godlewski, Z. Rajfur, J. Sławiński, et al.Spectra of the formaldehyde-induced ultraweak luminescence from yeast cellsJ Photochem Photobiol, B, 21 (1) (1993), pp. 29-35, 10.1016/1011-1344(93)80160-bView PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
108. 108L.W.E. Tessaro, B.T. Dotta, M.A. PersingerBacterial biophotons as non-local information carriers: species-specific spectral characteristics of a stress responseMicrobiologyopen, 8 (6) (2019), Article e00761, 10.1002/mbo3.761View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
109. 109F.M. Laager, N.M. Becker, S.H. Park, et al.Effects of Lac operon activation, deletion of the Yhha gene, and the removal of oxygen on the ultra-weak photon emission of Escherichia coliElectromagn Biol Med, 28 (3) (2009), pp. 240-249, 10.3109/15368370903065820View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
110. 110T.I. Quickenden, R.N. TilburyLuminescence spectra of exponential and stationary phase cultures of respiratory deficient Saccharomyces cerevisiaeJ Photochem Photobiol, B, 8 (2) (1991), pp. 169-174, 10.1016/1011-1344(91)80055-mView PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
111. 111R.P. Bajpai, P.K. BajpaiLight-induced biophotonic emission from plant tissuesJ Biolumin Chemilumin, 7 (3) (1992), pp. 177-184, 10.1002/bio.1170070304View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
112. 112F.A. Popp, B. Ruth, W. Bahr, et al.Emission of visible and ultraviolet radiation by active biological systemsCollect Phenom, 3 (1981), pp. 187-214Google Scholar
113. 113B. ChaoA study on ultra-weak photon-counting imaging of rice seeds at the stage of germinationJ Acta Biophys Sinica, 14 (4) (1998), pp. 773-776Google Scholar
114. 114W. Chen, D. CaoLuminescence nanomaterials and applicationsNanomaterials, 13 (6) (2023), p. 1047, 10.3390/nano13061047Google Scholar
115. 115E. Hideg, M. Kobayashi, H. InabaUltraweak photoemission from dark-adapted leaves and isolated chloroplastsFEBS Lett, 275 (1-2) (1990), pp. 121-124, 10.1016/0014-5793(90)81454-vView PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
116. 116Y. Yan, F.A. Popp, S. Sigrist, et al.Further analysis of delayed luminescence of plantsJ Photochem Photobiol, B, 78 (3) (2005), pp. 235-244, 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2004.11.012View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
117. 117Y. Liang, H. Song, Q. Liu, et al.Study on spectrum estimation in biophoton emission signal analysis of wheat varietiesMath Probl Eng, 2 (2014), pp. 1-9, 10.1155/2014/606275Google Scholar
118. 118E. Bertogna, J. Bezerra, E. Conforti, et al.Acute stress in seedlings detected by ultra-weak photon emissionJ Photochem Photobiol, B, 118 (2013), pp. 74-76, 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2012.11.005View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
119. 119C.M. Gallep, D. RobertTime-resolved ultra-weak photon emission as germination performance indicator in single seedlingsJ Photochem Photobiol, A, 1 (2020), Article 100001, 10.1016/j.jpap.2020.100001View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
120. 120R.Q. Scott, M.U. InabaUltraweak emission imagery of mitosing soybeansJ Applied Physics B, 48 (1989), pp. 183-185View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
121. 121T. Makino, K. Kato, H. Iyozumi, et al.Ultraweak luminescence generated by sweet potato and Fusarium oxysporum interactions associated with a defense responsePhotochem Photobiol, 64 (6) (1996), pp. 953-956, 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1996.tb01860.xView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
122. 122C.M. Gallep, S.R. Dos SantosPhoton-counts during germination of wheat (Triticum aestivum) in wastewater sediment solutions correlated with seedling growthJ Seed Sci Technol, 35 (3) (2007), pp. 607-614, 10.15258/sst.2007.35.3.08View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
123. 123Mello Gallep C. deUltraweak, spontaneous photon emission in seedlings: toxicological and chronobiological applicationsLuminescence, 29 (8) (2014), pp. 963-968, 10.1002/bio.2658Google Scholar
124. 124A. Prasad, P. Gouripeddi, H.R.N. Devireddy, et al.Spectral distribution of ultra-weak photon emission as a response to wounding in plants: an in vivo studyBiology, 9 (6) (2020), p. 139, 10.3390/biology9060139Google Scholar
125. 125M.L. Salin, K.L. Quince, D.J. HunterChemiluminescence from mechanically injured soybean root tissueJ Photobiochem Photobiophys, 9 (1985), pp. 271-279View PDFView articleGoogle Scholar
126. 126R. Kawabata, M. Uefune, T. Miike, et al.Biophoton emission from kidney bean leaf infested with tetranychus Kanzawai KishidaJpn J Appl Phys, 43 (8A) (2004), pp. 5646-5651, 10.1143/JJAP.43.5646View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
127. 127C.L. Oros, F. AlvesLeaf wound induced ultraweak photon emission is suppressed under anoxic stress: observations of Spathiphyllum under aerobic and anaerobic conditions using novel in vivo methodologyPLoS One, 13 (6) (2018), Article e0198962, 10.1371/journal.pone.0198962View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
128. 128K. Kato, H. Iyozumi, C. Kageyama, et al.Application of ultra-weak photon emission measurements in agricultureJ Photochem Photobiol, B, 139 (2014), pp. 54-62, 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2014.06.010View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
129. 129T. Ohya, S. Yoshida, R. Kawabata, et al.Biophoton emission due to drought injury in red beans : possibility of early detection of drought injuryJpn J Appl Phys, 41 (7R) (2002), p. 4766, 10.1143/JJAP.41.4766View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
130. 130T. Ohya, H. Kurashige, H. Okabe, et al.Early detection of salt stress damage by biophotons in red bean seedlingJpn J Appl Phys, 39 (6A) (2000), pp. 3696-3700, 10.1143/JJAP.39.3696View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
131. 131S. Kai, T. Mitani, M. FujikawaAnomalous biophoton emission during germination process of red beanJpn J Appl Phys, 32 (Part 2, No. 3B) (1993), pp. L417-L419View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
132. 132J.F. Stuefer, H. HuberDifferential effects of light quantity and spectral light quality on growth, morphology and development of two stoloniferous Potentilla speciesOecologia, 117 (1-2) (1998), pp. 1-8, 10.1007/s004420050624View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
133. 133B. Schauf, L.M. Repas, R. KaufmannLocalization of ultraweak photon emission in plantsJ. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem., 55 (2) (2010), pp. 287-291Google Scholar
134. 134M. Kobayashi, B. Devaraj, M. Usa, et al.Development and applications of new technology for two-dimensional space-time characterization and correlation analysis of ultraweak biophoton informationFront Med Biol Eng, 7 (4) (1996), pp. 299-309View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
135. 135P. Roschger, R.Q. Scott, B. Devaraj, et al.Observation of phase transitions in intact leaves by intrinsic low-level chemiluminescenceJ Photochem Photobiol, A, 57 (3) (2010), pp. 580-583, 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1993.tb02337.xGoogle Scholar
136. 136S. Kai, T.O.K. Moriya, T. FujimotoGrowth control and biophoton radiation by plant hormones in red beanJpn J Appl Phys, 34 (1995), pp. 6530-6538, 10.1143/JJAP.34.6530View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
137. 137W. Shi, K. Jiao, Y. Liang, et al.Efficient detection of internal infestation in wheat based on biophotonicsJ Photochem Photobiol, B, 155 (2016), pp. 137-143, 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2015.12.016View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
138. 138R. Winkler, H. Guttenberger, H. KlimaUltraweak and induced photon emission after wounding of plantsPhotochem Photobiol, 85 (4) (2009), pp. 962-965, 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2009.00537View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
139. 139S. Duan, F. Wang, Y. ZhangResearch on the biophoton emission of wheat kernels based on permutation entropyOptik, 178 (2019), pp. 723-730, 10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.09.169View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
140. 140T.G. Mamedov, G.A. Popov, V.V. KonevUltraweak luminescence of various organismsJ Biofizika, 14 (6) (1969), pp. 1102-1107View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
141. 141R.Q. Scott, P. Roschger, B. Devaraj, et al.Monitoring a mammalian nuclear membrane phase transition by intrinsic ultraweak light emissionFEBS Lett, 285 (1) (1991), pp. 97-98, 10.1016/0014-5793(91)80733-jView PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
142. 142H.J. NiggliThe cell nucleus of cultured melanoma cells as a source of ultraweak photon emissionNaturwissenschaften, 83 (1) (1996), pp. 41-44, 10.1007/BF01139311View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
143. 143R. Fan, N. Liu, J. DaiBiophoton radiations induced by hydrogen peroxide in mouse liver slices and hepatocyte nuclei in relation to the biophysical action mechanism of reactive oxygen speciesNatur Sci (6) (2022), p. 14CrossrefGoogle Scholar
144. 144R. van Wijk, H. van Aken, W. Mei, et al.Light-induced photon emission by mammalian cellsJ Photochem Photobiol, B, 18 (1) (1993), pp. 75-79, 10.1016/1011-1344(93)80042-8View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
145. 145H. InabaSuper-high sensitivity systems for detection and spectral analysis of ultraweak photon emission from biological cells and tissuesExperientia, 44 (7) (1988), pp. 550-559, 10.1007/BF01953302View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
146. 146H.W. Kim, S.B. Sim, C.K. Kim, et al.Spontaneous photon emission and delayed luminescence of two types of human lung cancer tissues: adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinomaCancer Lett, 229 (2) (2005), pp. 283-289, 10.1016/j.canlet.2005.04.038View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
147. 147J. Kim, C. Choi, J. Lim, et al.Measurements of spontaneous ultraweak photon emission and delayed luminescence from human cancer tissuesJ Altern Complement Med, 11 (5) (2005), pp. 879-884, 10.1089/acm.2005.11.879View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
148. 148J. Kim, J. Lim, H. Kim, et al.Scanning spontaneous photon emission from transplanted ovarian tumor of mice using a photomultiplier tubeElectromagn Biol Med, 25 (2) (2006), pp. 97-102, 10.1080/15368370600719000View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
149. 149H.J. Niggli, S. Tudisco, G. Privitera, et al.Laser-ultraviolet-A-induced ultraweak photon emission in mammalian cellsJ Biomed Opt, 10 (2) (2005), Article 024006, 10.1117/1.1899185View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
150. 150A. Aryan, F. Aghajanpour, M. Dashtdar, et al.Exploring intercellular dynamics: ultra-weak biophoton emission as a novel indicator of altered cell functions and disease in oligospermia miceJ Lasers Med Sci., 14 (2023), Article e65, 10.34172/jlms.2023.65View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
151. 151J. Du, T. Deng, B. Cao, et al.The application and trend of ultra-weak photon emission in biology and medicineFront Chem, 11 (2023), Article 1140128, 10.3389/fchem.2023.1140128View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
152. 152P. Evelson, C.P. Ordóñez, S. Llesuy, et al.Oxidative stress and in vivo chemiluminescence in mouse skin exposed to UVA radiationJ Photochem Photobiol, B, 38 (2-3) (1997), pp. 215-219, 10.1016/s1011-1344(96)07437-4View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
153. 153L. Chen, Z. Wang, J. DaiSpectral blueshift of biophotonic activity and transmission in the ageing mouse brainBrain Res, 1749 (2020), Article 147133, 10.1016/j.brainres.2020.147133View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
154. 154Z. Wang, Z. Xu, Y. Luo, et al.Reduced biophotonic activities and spectral blueshift in Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia models with cognitive impairmentFront Aging Neurosci, 15 (2023), Article 1208274, 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1208274View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
155. 155B. Devaraj, R.Q. Scott, P. Roschger, et al.Ultraweak light emission from rat liver nucleiPhotochem Photobiol, 54 (2) (1991), pp. 289-293, 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1991.tb02018.xView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
156. 156C. Wang, I. Bókkon, J. Dai, et al.Spontaneous and visible light-induced ultraweak photon emission from rat eyesBrain Res, 1369 (2011), pp. 1-9, 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.10.077View PDFView articleGoogle Scholar
157. 157M. Kobayashi, M. Takeda, M. Yoshida, et al.Highly sensitive imaging of ultraweak biophoton emission from rat brain and its spatiotemporal analysisNippon Laser Igakkaishi, 18 (Suppl) (1997), pp. 217-220, 10.2530/jslsm1980.18.Supplement_217Google Scholar
158. 158M. Kobayashi, M. Takeda, T. Sato, et al.In vivo imaging of spontaneous ultraweak photon emission from a rat’s brain correlated with cerebral energy metabolism and oxidative stressNeurosci Res, 34 (2) (1999), pp. 103-113, 10.1016/s0168-0102(99)00040-1View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
159. 159M. Kobayashi, M. Takeda, K. Ito, et al.Two-dimensional photon counting imaging and spatiotemporal characterization of ultraweak photon emission from a rat’s brain in vivoJ Neurosci Methods, 93 (2) (1999), pp. 163-168, 10.1016/s0165-0270(99)00140-5View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
160. 160E. van Wijk, M. Kobayashi, R. van Wijk, et al.Imaging of ultra-weak photon emission in a rheumatoid arthritis mouse modelPLoS One, 8 (12) (2013), Article e84579, 10.1371/journal.pone.0084579View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
161. 161T. Amano, M. Kobayashi, B. Devaraj, et al.Ultraweak biophoton emission imaging of transplanted bladder cancerUrol Res, 23 (5) (1995), pp. 315-318, 10.1007/BF00300020View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
162. 162M. Takeda, M. Kobayashi, M. Takayama, et al.Biophoton detection as a novel technique for cancer imagingCancer Sci, 95 (8) (2004), pp. 656-661, 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2004.tb03325.xView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
163. 163E. van Wijk, M. Kobayashi, R. van Wijk, et al.Imaging of ultra-weak photon emission in a rheumatoid arthritis mouse modelPLoS One, 8 (12) (2013), Article e84579, 10.1371/journal.pone.0084579View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
164. 164M. He, E. van Wijk, H. van Wietmarschen, et al.Spontaneous ultra-weak photon emission in correlation to inflammatory metabolism and oxidative stress in a mouse model of collagen-induced arthritisJ Photochem Photobiol, B, 168 (2017), pp. 98-106, 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2016.12.036View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
165. 165X. Zhao, M. Yang, Y. Wang, et al.Spectrum of spontaneous photon emission as a promising biophysical indicator for breast cancer researchSci Rep, 7 (1) (2017), Article 13083, 10.1038/s41598-017-13516-8View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
166. 166M. Usa, B. Devaraj, M. Kobayashi, et al.Detection and characterization of ultraweak biophotons from life processes.Optic MetBiomed Environ Sci (1994), pp. 3-6Google Scholar
167. 167H. Inaba, M. UsaUltraweak photon emission from living states -blophoton imaging and blophotonic information detectionMed Imag Technol, 112 (2) (1995), pp. 1102-1103, 10.1007/BF00635172Google Scholar
168. 168D. Orgill, R.H. DemlingCurrent concepts and approaches to wound healingCrit Care Med, 16 (9) (1988), pp. 899-908, 10.1097/00003246-198809000-00016View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
169. 169R. van Wijk, M. Kobayashi, E.P. van WijkAnatomic characterization of human ultra-weak photon emission with a moveable photomultiplier and CCD imagingJ Photochem Photobiol, B, 83 (1) (2006), pp. 69-76, 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2005.12.005View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
170. 170M. Kobayashi, D. Kikuchi, H. OkamuraImaging of ultraweak spontaneous photon emission from human body displaying diurnal rhythmPLoS One, 4 (7) (2009), Article e6256, 10.1371/journal.pone.0006256View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
171. 171A. Prasad, P. PospišilTwo-dimensional imaging of spontaneous ultra-weak photon emission from the human skin: role of reactive oxygen speciesJ Biophotonics, 4 (11-12) (2011), pp. 840-849, 10.1002/jbio.201100073View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
172. 172G. Sauermann, W.P. Mei, U. Hoppe, et al.Ultraweak photon emission of human skin in vivo: influence of topically applied antioxidants on human skinMethods Enzymol, 300 (1999), pp. 419-428, 10.1016/s0076-6879(99)00147-0View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
173. 173X. Zhao, E. van Wijk, Y. Yan, et al.Ultra-weak photon emission of hands in aging predictionJ Photochem Photobiol, B, 162 (2016), pp. 529-534, 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2016.07.030View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
174. 174M. Yang, J. Pang, J. Liu, et al.Spectral discrimination between healthy people and cold patients using spontaneous photon emissionBiomed Opt Express, 6 (4) (2015), pp. 1331-1339, 10.1364/BOE.6.001331View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
175. 175M. Cifra, E.V. Wijk, H. Koch, et al.Measurement of spontaneous ultra-weak photon emission from human body: spontaneous ultra-weak photon emission varies diurnallyInternational Conference on Measurement (2007)Google Scholar
176. 176M. Cifra, E.V. Wijk, H. Koch, et al.Spontaneous ultra-weak photon emission from human hands is time dependentRadioengineering, 16 (2) (2007), pp. 15-19, 10.1117/12.727672View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
177. 177E.P. van Wijk, R. Lüdtke, R. van WijkDifferential effects of relaxation techniques on ultraweak photon emissionJ Altern Complement Med, 14 (3) (2008), pp. 241-250, 10.1089/acm.2007.7185View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
178. 178E.P. van Wijk, H. Koch, S. Bosman, et al.Anatomic characterization of human ultra-weak photon emission in practitioners of transcendental meditation (TM) and control subjectsJ Altern Complement Med, 12 (1) (2006), pp. 31-38, 10.1089/acm.2006.12.31View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
179. 179F. Zapata, V. Pastor-Ruiz, F. Ortega-Ojeda, et al.Increment of spontaneous human biophoton emission caused by anger emotional statesMicrochem J, 169 (4) (2021), Article 106558, 10.1016/j.microc.2021.106558View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
180. 180J.A. Ives, E.P. van Wijk, N. Bat, et al.Ultraweak photon emission as a non-invasive health assessment: a systematic reviewPLoS One, 9 (2) (2014), Article e87401, 10.1371/journal.pone.0087401View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
181. 181M. KobayashiHighly sensitive imaging for ultra-weak photon emission from living organismsJ Photochem Photobiol, B, 139 (2014), pp. 34-38, 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2013.11.011View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
182. 182F. Zapata, V. Pastor-Ruiz, F. Ortega-Ojeda, et al.Human ultra-weak photon emission as non-invasive spectroscopic tool for diagnosis of internal states – a reviewJ Photochem Photobiol, B, 216 (2021), Article 112141, 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2021.112141View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
183. 183M. Kobayashi, T. Iwasa, M. TadaPolychromatic spectral pattern analysis of ultra-weak photon emissions from a human bodyJ Photochem Photobiol, B, 159 (2016), pp. 186-190, 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2016.03.037View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
184. 184S. Cohen, F.A. PoppBiophoton emission of the human bodyJ Photochem Photobiol, B, 40 (2) (1997), pp. 187-189, 10.1016/s1011-1344(97)00050-xView PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
185. 185H.H. Jung, J.M. Yang, W.M. Woo, et al.Signal characteristics of biophoton emission from human handsKey Eng Mater, 277–279 (Pt1) (2005), pp. 96-101https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.277-279.96View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
186. 186B. Yoda, Y. Goto, K. Sato, et al.Ultra-weak chemiluminescence of smokers’ bloodArch Environ Health, 40 (3) (1985), pp. 148-150, 10.1080/00039896.1985.10545907View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
187. 187S. Agatsuma, T. Nagoshi, M. Kobayashi, et al.Hydroxyl radical-induced characteristic chemiluminescent spectra from plasma of hemodialysis patientsClin Chem, 38 (1) (1992), pp. 48-55CrossrefView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
188. 188M. Kobayashi, M. Usa, H. InabaHighly sensitive detection and spectral analysis of ultraweak photon emission from living samples of human origin for the measurement of biomedical informationTrans Soc Instrum Control Eng, 30 (4) (1994), pp. 385-391, 10.9746/sicetr1965.30.385Google Scholar
189. 189R. Burgos, J.C. Schoeman, L. Winden, et al.Ultra-weak photon emission as a dynamic tool for monitoring oxidative stress metabolismSci Rep, 7 (1) (2017), p. 1229, 10.1038/s41598-017-01229-xView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
190. 190K. Kobayashi, H. Okabe, S. Kawano, et al.Biophoton emission induced by heat shockPLoS One, 9 (8) (2014), Article e105700, 10.1371/journal.pone.0105700View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
191. 191R.C.R. Burgos, R. Ramautar, E. van Wijk, et al.Pharmacological targeting of ROS reaction network in myeloid leukemia cells monitored by ultra-weak photon emissionOncotarget, 9 (2) (2018), pp. 2028-2034, 10.18632/oncotarget.23175View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
192. 192N.R. Rizzo, N.C. Hank, J. ZhangDetecting presence of cardiovascular disease through mitochondria respiration as depicted through biophotonic emissionRedox Biol, 8 (2016), pp. 11-17, 10.1016/j.redox.2015.11.014View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
193. 193Y. OkayamaOxidative stress in allergic and inflammatory skin diseasesCurr Drug Targets – Inflamm Allergy, 4 (4) (2005), pp. 517-519, 10.2174/1568010054526386View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
194. 194A.P. Kalra, A. Benny, S.M. Travis, et al.Electronic energy migration in microtubulesACS Cent Sci, 9 (3) (2023), pp. 352-361, 10.1021/acscentsci.2c01114View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
195. 195H.H. Jung, W.M. Woo, J.M. Yang, et al.Left-right asymmetry of biophoton emission from hemiparesis patientsIndian J Exp Biol, 41 (5) (2003), pp. 452-456View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
196. 196M. Sun, E. van Wijk, S. Koval, et al.Measuring ultra-weak photon emission as a non-invasive diagnostic tool for detecting early-stage type 2 diabetes: a step toward personalized medicineJ Photochem Photobiol, B, 166 (2017), pp. 86-93, 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2016.11.013View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
197. 197F.A. PoppCancer growth and its inhibition in terms of coherenceElectromagn Biol Med, 28 (1) (2009), pp. 53-60, 10.1080/15368370802711805View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
198. 198N.J. Murugan, N. Rouleau, L.M. Karbowski, et al.Biophotonic markers of malignancy: Discriminating cancers using wavelength-specific biophotonsBiochem Biophys Rep, 13 (2017), pp. 7-11, 10.1016/j.bbrep.2017.11.001Google Scholar
199. 199M. Hossu, L. Ma, X. Zou, et al.Enhancement of biophoton emission of prostate cancer cells by Ag nanoparticlesCancer Nanotechnol, 4 (1-3) (2013), pp. 21-26, 10.1007/s12645-013-0034-7View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
200. 200A. Scordino, I. Baran, M. Gulino, et al.Ultra-weak delayed luminescence in cancer research: a review of the results by the ARETUSA equipmentJ Photochem Photobiol, B, 139 (2014), pp. 76-84, 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2014.03.027View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
201. 201X. Shao, X. Lu, J. Liao, et al.New avenues for systematically inferring cell-cell communication: through single-cell transcriptomics dataProtein Cell, 11 (12) (2020), pp. 866-880, 10.1007/s13238-020-00727-5View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
202. 202H.H. Gerdes, R. PepperkokCell-to-cell communication: current views and future perspectivesCell Tissue Res, 352 (1) (2013), pp. 1-3, 10.1007/s00441-013-1590-1View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
203. 203G. RegueraWhen microbial conversations get physicalTrends Microbiol, 19 (3) (2011), pp. 105-113, 10.1016/j.tim.2010.12.007View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
204. 204B.F.E. Matarèse, J. Lad, C. Seymour, et al.Bio-acoustic signaling; exploring the potential of sound as a mediator of low-dose radiation and stress responses in the environmentInt J Radiat Biol, 98 (6) (2022), pp. 1083-1097, 10.1080/09553002.2020.1834162View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
205. 205M. Gagliano, M. Renton, N. Duvdevani, et al.Acoustic and magnetic communication in plants: is it possible?Plant Signal Behav, 7 (10) (2012), pp. 1346-1348, 10.4161/psb.21517Google Scholar
206. 206M. Gagliano, M. RentonLove thy neighbour: facilitation through an alternative signalling modality in plantsBMC Ecol, 13 (2013), p. 19, 10.1186/1472-6785-13-19View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
207. 207D.S. Adams, M. LevinEndogenous voltage gradients as mediators of cell-cell communication: strategies for investigating bioelectrical signals during pattern formationCell Tissue Res, 352 (1) (2013), pp. 95-122, 10.1007/s00441-012-1329-4View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
208. 208A.T. Esser, K.C. Smith, J.C. Weaver, et al.Mathematical model of morphogen electrophoresis through gap junctionsDev Dyn, 235 (8) (2006), pp. 2144-2159, 10.1002/dvdy.20870View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
209. 209E.T. Wang, M. ZhaoRegulation of tissue repair and regeneration by electric fieldsChin J Traumatol, 13 (1) (2010), pp. 55-61View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
210. 210C.D. McCaig, A.M. Rajnicek, B. Song, et al.Controlling cell behavior electrically: current views and future potentialPhysiol Rev, 85 (3) (2005), pp. 943-978, 10.1152/physrev.00020.2004View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
211. 211L. Liu, B. Huang, Y. Lu, et al.Interactions between electromagnetic radiation and biological systemsiScience, 27 (3) (2024), Article 109201, 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109201View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
212. 212M. Cifra, J. Pokorný, D. Havelka, et al.Electric field generated by axial longitudinal vibration modes of microtubuleBiosystems, 100 (2) (2010), pp. 122-131, 10.1016/j.biosystems.2010.02.007View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
213. 213C. Rossi, A. Foletti, A. Magnani, et al.New perspectives in cell communication: Bioelectromagnetic interactionsSemin Cancer Biol, 21 (3) (2011), pp. 207-214, 10.1016/j.semcancer.2011.04.003View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
214. 214G. Albrecht-BuehlerSurface extensions of 3T3 cells towards distant infrared light sourcesJ Cell Biol, 114 (3) (1991), pp. 493-502, 10.1083/jcb.114.3.493View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
215. 215F. ScholkmannLong range physical cell-to-cell signalling via mitochondria inside membrane nanotubes: a hypothesisTheor Biol Med Model, 13 (1) (2016), p. 16, 10.1186/s12976-016-0042-5View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
216. 216J. Shen, J. Zhang, H. Xiao, et al.Mitochondria are transported along microtubules in membrane nanotubes to rescue distressed cardiomyocytes from apoptosisCell Death Dis, 9 (2) (2018), p. 81, 10.1038/s41419-017-0145-xView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
217. 217J. Zhang, Y. ZhangMembrane nanotubes: novel communication between distant cellsSci China Life Sci, 56 (11) (2013), pp. 994-999, 10.1007/s11427-013-4548-3Google Scholar
218. 218F. ScholkmannTwo emerging topics regarding long-range physical signaling in neurosystems: membrane nanotubes and electromagnetic fieldsJ Integr Neurosci, 14 (2) (2015), pp. 135-153, 10.1142/S0219635215300115View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
219. 219S. Bloemendal, U. KückCell-to-cell communication in plants, animals, and fungi: a comparative reviewNaturwissenschaften, 100 (1) (2013), pp. 3-19, 10.1007/s00114-012-0988-zView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
220. 220J. Du, T. Deng, B. Cao, et al.The application and trend of ultra-weak photon emission in biology and medicineFront Chem, 11 (2023), Article 1140128, 10.3389/fchem.2023.1140128View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
221. 221M. LevinBioelectromagnetics in morphogenesisBioelectromagnetics, 24 (5) (2003), pp. 295-315, 10.1002/bem.10104View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
222. 222A. Prasad, C. Rossi, S. Lamponi, et al.New perspective in cell communication: potential role of ultra-weak photon emissionJ Photochem Photobiol, B, 139 (2014), pp. 47-53, 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2014.03.004View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
223. 223G. Albrecht-BuehlerRudimentary form of cellular “vision”Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A., 89 (17) (1992), pp. 8288-8292, 10.1073/pnas.89.17.8288View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
224. 224A.V.P. Kaznacheev, L.P. Mikhailova, N.B. KartashovDistant intercellular electromagnetic interaction between two tissue culturesJ Bull Exp Biol, 89 (3) (1980), pp. 345-348, 10.1007/BF00834249View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
225. 225V.P. Galantsev, S.G. Kovalenko, A.A. Moltchanov, et al.Lipid peroxidation, low-level chemiluminescence and regulation of secretion in the mammary glandExperientia, 49 (10) (1993), pp. 870-875, 10.1007/BF01952600View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
226. 226R.R. Mould, A.M. Mackenzie, I. Kalampouka, et al.Ultra weak photon emission-a brief reviewFront Physiol, 15 (2024), Article 1348915, 10.3389/fphys.2024.1348915View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
227. 227R. VanwijkBio-photons and bio-communicationJ Sci Explor, 15 (2) (2001), pp. 183-197View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
228. 228S.B. Ahmad, F.E. McNeill, W.V. Prestwich, et al.Quantification of ultraviolet photon emission from interaction of charged particles in materials of interest in radiation biology researchNucl Instrum Meth B, 319 (2014), pp. 48-54, 10.1016/j.nimb.2013.10.012View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
229. 229S.B. Ahmad, F.E. McNeill, S.H. Byun, et al.Ion beam induced luminescence: relevance to radiation induced bystander effectsNucl Instrum Meth B, 288 (2012), pp. 81-88, 10.1016/j.nimb.2012.05.043View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
230. 230J.P. McCarthy, R.S. Bodroghy, P.B. Jahrling, et al.Differential alterations in host peripheral polymorphonuclear leukocyte chemiluminescence during the course of bacterial and viral infectionsInfect Immun, 30 (3) (1980), pp. 824-831, 10.1128/iai.30.3.824-831.1980View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
231. 231R.P. Bajpai, P.K. Bajpai, D. RoyUltraweak photon emission in germinating seeds: a signal of biological orderLuminescence, 6 (4) (1991), pp. 227-230, 10.1002/bio.1170060403View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
232. 232X. Shen, W. Mei, X. XuActivation of neutrophils by a chemically separated but optically coupled neutrophil population undergoing respiratory burstExperientia, 50 (10) (1994), pp. 963-968, 10.1007/BF01923488View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
233. 233C.D. Cerdeira, M.R.P.L. Brigagão, M.L. Carli, et al.Low-level laser therapy stimulates the oxidative burst in human neutrophils and increases their fungicidal capacityJ Biophotonics, 9 (11-12) (2016), pp. 1180-1188, 10.1002/jbio.201600035View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
234. 234F.A. Popp, Z. JZMechanism of interaction between electromagnetic fields and living organismsSci China Life Sci, 43 (5) (2000), p. 507Google Scholar
235. 235R. Tang, J. DaiSpatiotemporal imaging of glutamate-induced biophotonic activities and transmission in neural circuitsPLoS One, 9 (1) (2014), Article e85643, 10.1371/journal.pone.0085643View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
236. 236R. Tang, J. DaiBiophoton signal transmission and processing in the brainJ Photochem Photobiol, B, 139 (2014), pp. 71-75, 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2013.12.008View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
237. 237F. Grass, H. Klima, S. KasperBiophotons, microtubules and CNS, is our brain a “holographic computer”Med Hypotheses, 62 (2) (2004), pp. 169-172, 10.1016/S0306-9877(03)00308-6View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
238. 238P. Kurian, T.O. Obisesan, T.J.A. CraddockOxidative species-induced excitonic transport in tubulin aromatic networks: potential implications for neurodegenerative diseaseJ Photochem Photobiol, B, 175 (2017), pp. 109-124, 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2017.08.033View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
239. 239A.P. Bat’ianovDistant-optical interaction of mitochondria through quartzBiull Eksp Biol Med., 97 (6) (1984), pp. 675-677View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
240. 240M. Rahnama, J.A. Tuszynski, I. Bókkon, et al.Emission of mitochondrial biophotons and their effect on electrical activity of membrane via microtubulesJ Integr Neurosci, 10 (1) (2011), pp. 65-88, 10.1142/S0219635211002622View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
241. 241R. Thar, M. KühlPropagation of electromagnetic radiation in mitochondria?J Theor Biol, 230 (2) (2004), pp. 261-270, 10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.05.021View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
242. 242J. McFadden, J. Al-KhaliliThe origins of quantum biologyProc Math Phys Eng Sci, 474 (2220) (2018), Article 20180674, 10.1098/rspa.2018.0674View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
243. 243H. Nagasawa, J.B. LittleInduction of sister chromatid exchanges by extremely low doses of alpha-particlesCancer Res, 52 (22) (1992), pp. 6394-6396View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
244. 244E.J. HallThe bystander effectHealth Phys, 85 (1) (2003), pp. 31-35, 10.1097/00004032-200307000-00008View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
245. 245C. Shao, M. Aoki, Y. FurusawaBystander effect on cell growth stimulation in neoplastic HSGc cells induced by heavy-ion irradiationRadiat Environ Biophys, 42 (3) (2003), pp. 183-187, 10.1007/s00411-003-0202-yView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
246. 246C. Shao, M. Folkard, B.D. Michael, et al.Targeted cytoplasmic irradiation induces bystander responsesProc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 101 (37) (2004), pp. 13495-13500, 10.1073/pnas.0404930101View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
247. 247C. Shao, M. Folkard, K.M. PriseRole of TGF-beta1 and nitric oxide in the bystander response of irradiated glioma cellsOncogene, 27 (4) (2008), pp. 434-440, 10.1038/sj.onc.1210653View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
248. 248C. Mothersill, C. SeymourRadiation-induced bystander effects: past history and future directionsRadiat Res, 155 (6) (2001), pp. 759-767, 10.1667/0033-7587(2001)155[0759:ribeph]2.0.co;2View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
249. 249C. Mothersill, C. SeymourMedium from irradiated human epithelial cells but not human fibroblasts reduces the clonogenic survival of unirradiated cellsInt J Radiat Biol, 71 (4) (1997), pp. 421-427, 10.1080/095530097144030View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
250. 250D. Frankenberg, K. Greif, U. GiesenRadiation response of primary human skin fibroblasts and their bystander cells after exposure to counted particles at low and high LETInt J Radiat Biol, 82 (1) (2006), pp. 59-67, 10.1080/09553000600582979View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
251. 251H. Tang, L. Cai, X. He, et al.Radiation-induced bystander effect and its clinical implicationsFront Oncol, 13 (2023), Article 1124412, 10.3389/fonc.2023.1124412View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
252. 252Z. Liu, C.E. Mothersill, F.E. McNeill, et al.A dose threshold for a medium transfer bystander effect for a human skin cell lineRadiat Res, 166 (1 Pt 1) (2006), pp. 19-23, 10.1667/RR3580.1Google Scholar
253. 253P.J. Coates, J.K. Rundle, S.A. Lorimore, et al.Indirect macrophage responses to ionizing radiation: implications for genotype-dependent bystander signalingCancer Res, 68 (2) (2008), pp. 450-456, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-3050View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
254. 254G. Kashino, K.M. Prise, G. Schettino, et al.Evidence for induction of DNA double strand breaks in the bystander response to targeted soft X-rays in CHO cellsMutat Res, 556 (1-2) (2004), pp. 209-215, 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2004.08.009View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
255. 255S. Kirolikar, P. Prasannan, G.V. Raghuram, et al.Prevention of radiation-induced bystander effects by agents that inactivate cell-free chromatin released from irradiated dying cellsCell Death Dis, 9 (12) (2018), p. 1142, 10.1038/s41419-018-1181-xView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
256. 256N. Autsavapromporn, I. Plante, C. Liu, et al.Genetic changes in progeny of bystander human fibroblasts after microbeam irradiation with X-rays, protons or carbon ions: the relevance to cancer riskInt J Radiat Biol, 91 (1) (2015), pp. 62-70, 10.3109/09553002.2014.950715View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
257. 257R. Ren, M. He, C. Dong, et al.Dose response of micronuclei induced by combination radiation of α-particles and γ-rays in human lymphoblast cellsMutat Res, 741–742 (2013), pp. 51-56, 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2012.12.007View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
258. 258J.B. LittleCellular radiation effects and the bystander responseMutat Res, 597 (1-2) (2006), pp. 113-118, 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2005.12.001View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
259. 259Y. Zhao, X. Ma, J. Wang, et al.The roles of p21(Waf1/CIP1) and Hus1 in generation and transmission of damage signals stimulated by low-dose alpha-particle irradiationRadiat Res, 184 (6) (2015), pp. 578-585, 10.1667/RR4165.1View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
260. 260S.A. Lorimore, S. Rastogi, D. Mukherjee, et al.The influence of p53 functions on radiation-induced inflammatory bystander-type signaling in murine bone marrowRadiat Res, 179 (4) (2013), pp. 406-415, 10.1667/RR3158.2View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
261. 261H. Furlong, C. Mothersill, F.M. Lyng, et al.Apoptosis is signalled early by low doses of ionising radiation in a radiation-induced bystander effectMutat Res, 741–742 (2013), pp. 35-43, 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2013.02.001View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
262. 262M. Tomita, M. Maeda, K. Kobayashi, et al.Dose response of soft X-ray-induced bystander cell killing affected by p53 statusRadiat Res, 179 (2) (2013), pp. 200-207, 10.1667/RR3010.1View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
263. 263F.M. Lyng, P. Maguire, B. McClean, et al.The involvement of calcium and MAP kinase signaling pathways in the production of radiation-induced bystander effectsRadiat Res, 165 (4) (2006), pp. 400-409, 10.1667/rr3527.1View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
264. 264M.D. Gow, C.B. Seymour, L.A. Ryan, et al.Induction of bystander response in human glioma cells using high-energy electrons: a role for TGF-beta1Radiat Res, 173 (6) (2010), pp. 769-778, 10.1667/RR1895.1View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
265. 265B.P. Surinov, V.G. Isaeva, N.A. KarpovaPost-radiation communicative induction of blood and immunity disordersPatol Fiziol Eksp Ter (3) (1998), pp. 7-10View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
266. 266E.V. Daev, B.P. Surinov, A.V. Dukel’skaia, et al.Chromosomal abnormalities and spleenocyte production in laboratory mouse males after exposure to stress chemosignalsTsitologiia, 49 (8) (2007), pp. 696-701View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
267. 267C. Mothersill, R.W. Smith, J. Fazzari, et al.Evidence for a physical component to the radiation-induced bystander effect?Int J Radiat Biol, 88 (8) (2012), pp. 583-591, 10.3109/09553002.2012.698366View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
268. 268V.G. Isaeva, B.P. SurinovPostradiation volatile secretion and development of immunosupression effectes by laboratory mice with various genotypeRadiat Biol Radioecol, 47 (1) (2007), pp. 10-16View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
269. 269I. Mosse, P. Marozik, C. Seymour, et al.The effect of melanin on the bystander effect in human keratinocytesMutat Res, 597 (1-2) (2006), pp. 133-137, 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2005.09.006View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
270. 270C. Mothersill, G. Moran, F. McNeill, et al.A role for bioelectric effects in the induction of bystander signals by ionizing radiation?Dose Response, 5 (3) (2007), pp. 214-229, 10.2203/dose-response.06-011.MothersillGoogle Scholar
271. 271M. Konopacka, J. Rogoliński, K. SlosarekDirect and bystander effects induced by scattered radiation generated during penetration of radiation inside a water-phantomMutat Res, 721 (1) (2011), pp. 6-14, 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2010.11.013View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
272. 272R.R. Mould, I. Kalampouka, E.L. Thomas, et al.Non-chemical signalling between mitochondriaFront Physiol, 14 (2023), Article 1268075, 10.3389/fphys.2023.1268075View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
273. 273E. Markiewicz, O.C IdowuDNA damage in human skin and the capacities of natural compounds to modulate the bystander signallingOpen Biol., 9 (12) (2019), Article 190208, 10.1098/rsob.190208View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
274. 274C. Mothersill, A. Cocchetto, C. SeymourLow dose and non-targeted radiation effects in environmental protection and medicine-A new model focusing on electromagnetic signalingInt J Mol Sci, 23 (19) (2022), Article 11118, 10.3390/ijms231911118View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
275. 275H. Nishiura, J. Kumagai, G. Kashino, et al.The bystander effect is a novel mechanism of UVA-induced melanogenesisPhotochem Photobiol, 88 (2) (2012), pp. 389-397, 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2011.01046.xView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
276. 276M. Le, F.E. McNeill, C. Seymour, et al.An observed effect of ultraviolet radiation emitted from beta-irradiated HaCaT cells upon non-beta-irradiated bystander cellsRadiat Res, 183 (3) (2015), pp. 279-290, 10.1667/RR13827.1View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
277. 277T. Douki, JL Ravanat, JP Pouget, et al.Minor contribution of direct ionization to DNA base damage induced by heavy ionsInt J Radiat Biol, 82 (2) (2006), pp. 119-127, 10.1080/09553000600573788View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
278. 278M. Le, C. Fernandez-Palomo, F.E. McNeill, et al.Exosomes are released by bystander cells exposed to radiation-induced biophoton signals: Reconciling the mechanisms mediating the bystander effectPLoS One, 12 (3) (2017), Article e0173685, 10.1371/journal.pone.0173685View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
279. 279B. Hu, L. Wu, W. Han, et al.The time and spatial effects of bystander response in mammalian cells induced by low dose radiationCarcinogenesis, 27 (2) (2006), pp. 245-251, 10.1093/carcin/bgi224View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
280. 280J. Xiao, X. Wang, Y. Wu, et al.Synergistic effect of resveratrol and HSV-TK/GCV therapy on murine hepatoma cellsCancer Biol Ther, 20 (2) (2019), pp. 183-191, 10.1080/15384047.2018.1523094View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
281. 281A.N. Sharetskiĭ, V.A. Kharlamov, B.P. SurinovEffect of radiation-induced bystander chemosignals of mice on the humoral immune response in spleen and lymph nodes of intact recipientsRadiat Biol Radioecol, 52 (3) (2012), pp. 229-233View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
282. 282J. Zhang, Y. Zhang, F. Mo, et al.The roles of HIF-1α in radiosensitivity and radiation-induced bystander effects under hypoxiaFront Cell Dev Biol, 9 (2021), Article 637454, 10.3389/fcell.2021.637454View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
283. 283A.H. Al-Mayah, S.L. Irons, R.C. Pink, et al.Possible role of exosomes containing RNA in mediating nontargeted effect of ionizing radiationRadiat Res, 177 (5) (2012), pp. 539-545, 10.1667/rr2868.1View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
284. 284C. Mothersill, R.G. Bristow, S.M. Harding, et al.A role for p53 in the response of bystander cells to receipt of medium borne signals from irradiated cellsInt J Radiat Biol, 87 (11) (2011), pp. 1120-1125, 10.3109/09553002.2011.610866View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
285. 285M. Widel, A. Lalik, A. Krzywon, et al.The different radiation response and radiation-induced bystander effects in colorectal carcinoma cells differing in p53 statusMutat Res, 778 (2015), pp. 61-70, 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2015.06.003View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
286. 286M. Le, C.E. Mothersill, C.B. Seymour, et al.An observed effect of p53 status on the bystander response to radiation-induced cellular photon emissionRadiat Res, 187 (2) (2017), pp. 169-185, 10.1667/RR14342.1View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
287. 287M. Buiatti, G. LongoRandomness and multilevel interactions in biologyTheory Biosci., 132 (3) (2013), pp. 139-158, 10.1007/s12064-013-0179-2View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
288. 288K. MatsunoFrom quantum measurement to biology via retrocausalityProg Biophys Mol Biol, 131 (2017), pp. 131-140, 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2017.06.012View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
289. 289C. Mothersill, R. Smith, J. Wang, et al.Biological entanglement-like effect after communication of fish prior to X-ray exposureDose Response, 16 (1) (2018), Article 1559325817750067, 10.1177/1559325817750067Google Scholar
290. 290C. Mothersill, C. SeymourRadiation-induced bystander effects: are they good, bad or both?Med Confl Surviv, 21 (2) (2005), pp. 101-110, 10.1080/13623690500073398View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
291. 291W.F. MorganNon-targeted and delayed effects of exposure to ionizing radiation: I. Radiation-induced genomic instability and bystander effects in vitroRadiat Res, 159 (5) (2003), pp. 567-580, 10.1667/0033-7587(2003)159[0567:nadeoe]2.0.co;2View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
292. 292W.F. MorganNon-targeted and delayed effects of exposure to ionizing radiation: II. Radiation-induced genomic instability and bystander effects in vivo, clastogenic factors and transgenerational effectsRadiat Res, 159 (5) (2003), pp. 581-596, 10.1667/0033-7587(2003)159[0581:nadeoe]2.0.co;2View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
293. 293W.F. Morgan, M.B. SowaNon-targeted effects induced by ionizing radiation: mechanisms and potential impact on radiation induced health effectsCancer Lett, 356 (1) (2015), pp. 17-21, 10.1016/j.canlet.2013.09.009View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
294. 294J.E. BaulchRadiation-induced genomic instability, epigenetic mechanisms and the mitochondria: a dysfunctional ménage a trois?Int J Radiat Biol, 95 (4) (2019), pp. 516-525, 10.1080/09553002.2018.1549757View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
295. 295E.I. Azzam, J.P. Jay-Gerin, D. PainIonizing radiation-induced metabolic oxidative stress and prolonged cell injuryCancer Lett, 327 (1-2) (2012), pp. 48-60, 10.1016/j.canlet.2011.12.012View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
296. 296D.R. Spitz, E.I. Azzam, J.J. Li, et al.Metabolic oxidation/reduction reactions and cellular responses to ionizing radiation: a unifying concept in stress response biologyCancer Metastasis Rev, 23 (3-4) (2004), pp. 311-322, 10.1023/B:CANC.0000031769.14728.bcView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
297. 297H. Zhou, G. Randers-Pehrson, C.A. Waldren, et al.Induction of a bystander mutagenic effect of alpha particles in mammalian cellsProc Natl Acad Sci USA, 97 (5) (2000), pp. 2099-2104, 10.1073/pnas.030420797View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
298. 298S.E. Weinberg, L.A. Sena, N.S. ChandelMitochondria in the regulation of innate and adaptive immunityImmunity, 42 (3) (2015), pp. 406-417, 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.02.002View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
299. 299J. Sia, J. Hagekyriakou, I. Chindris, et al.Regulatory T cells shape the differential impact of radiation dose-fractionation schedules on host innate and adaptive antitumor immune defensesInt J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 111 (2) (2021), pp. 502-514, 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.05.014View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
300. 300D. Averbeck, C. Rodriguez-LafrasseRole of mitochondria in radiation responses: epigenetic, metabolic, and signaling impactsInt J Mol Sci, 22 (20) (2021), Article 11047, 10.3390/ijms222011047View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
301. 301R. Van Wijk, E. Van Wijk, J. Pang, et al.Integrating ultra-weak photon emission analysis in mitochondrial researchFront Physiol, 11 (2020), p. 717, 10.3389/fphys.2020.00717View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
302. 302R.P. Chakrabarty, N.S. ChandelBeyond ATP, new roles of mitochondriaBiochemist, 44 (4) (2022), pp. 2-8, 10.1042/bio_2022_119View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
303. 303N.S. ChandelMitochondria as signaling organellesBMC Biol, 12 (2014), p. 34, 10.1186/1741-7007-12-34View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
304. 304W.X. Zong, J.D. Rabinowitz, E. WhiteMitochondria and cancerMol Cell, 61 (5) (2016), pp. 667-676, 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.02.011View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
305. 305T. ShimuraMitochondrial signaling pathways associated with DNA damage responsesInt J Mol Sci, 24 (7) (2023), p. 6128, 10.3390/ijms24076128View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
306. 306D. AverbeckLow-dose non-targeted effects and mitochondrial controlInt J Mol Sci, 24 (14) (2023), Article 11460, 10.3390/ijms241411460View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
307. 307T. Yamamori, H. Yasui, M. Yamazumi, et al.Ionizing radiation induces mitochondrial reactive oxygen species production accompanied by upregulation of mitochondrial electron transport chain function and mitochondrial content under control of the cell cycle checkpointFree Radic Biol Med, 53 (2) (2012), pp. 260-270, 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2012.04.033View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
308. 308E.I. Azzam, J.P. Jay-Gerin, D. PainIonizing radiation-induced metabolic oxidative stress and prolonged cell injuryCancer Lett, 327 (1-2) (2012), pp. 48-60, 10.1016/j.canlet.2011.12.012View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
309. 309S. Chen, Y. Zhao, W. Han, et al.Mitochondria-dependent signalling pathway are involved in the early process of radiation-induced bystander effectsBr J Cancer, 98 (11) (2008), pp. 1839-1844, 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604358View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
310. 310C. Mothersill, M. Le, A. Rusin, et al.Biophotons in radiobiology: inhibitors, comunicators and reactorsRadiat Prot Dosim, 183 (1-2) (2019), pp. 136-141, 10.1093/rpd/ncy271View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
311. 311J.E.J. Murphy, S. Nugent, C. Seymour, et al.Mitochondrial DNA point mutations and a novel deletion induced by direct low-LET radiation and by medium from irradiated cellsMutat Res, 585 (1-2) (2005), pp. 127-136, 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2005.04.011View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
312. 312F.M. Lyng, C.B. Seymour, C. MothersillProduction of a signal by irradiated cells which leads to a response in unirradiated cells characteristic of initiation of apoptosisBr J Cancer, 83 (9) (2000), pp. 1223-1230, 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1433View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
313. 313F.M. Lyng, O.L. Howe, B. McCleanReactive oxygen species-induced release of signalling factors in irradiated cells triggers membrane signalling and calcium influx in bystander cellsInt J Radiat Biol, 87 (7) (2011), pp. 683-695, 10.3109/09553002.2010.549533View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
314. 314C. Mothersill, T.D. Stamato, M.L. Perez, et al.Involvement of energy metabolism in the production of ‘bystander effects’ by radiationBr J Cancer, 82 (10) (2000), pp. 1740-1746, 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1109View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
315. 315M. Le, F.E. McNeill, C.B. Seymour, et al.Modulation of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) by radiation- induced biophotonsEnviron Res, 163 (2018), pp. 80-87, 10.1016/j.envres.2018.01.027View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
316. 316Y. IlanMicrotubules as a potential platform for energy transfer in biological systems: a target for implementing individualized, dynamic variability patterns to improve organ functionMol Cell Biochem, 478 (2) (2023), pp. 375-392, 10.1007/s11010-022-04513-1View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
317. 317W.W. Kam, R.B. BanatiEffects of ionizing radiation on mitochondriaFree Radic Biol Med, 65 (2013), pp. 607-619, 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2013.07.024View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
318. 318S. Prithivirajsingh, M.D. Story, S.A. Bergh, et al.Accumulation of the common mitochondrial DNA deletion induced by ionizing radiationFEBS Lett, 571 (1-3) (2004), pp. 227-232, 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.06.078View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
319. 319C. Richter, J.W. Park, B.N. AmesNormal oxidative damage to mitochondrial and nuclear DNA is extensiveProc Natl Acad Sci USA, 85 (17) (1988), pp. 6465-6467, 10.1073/pnas.85.17.6465View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
320. 320J.K. Leach, G. Van Tuyle, P.S. Lin, et al.Ionizing radiation-induced, mitochondria-dependent generation of reactive oxygen/nitrogenCancer Res, 61 (10) (2001), pp. 3894-3901View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
321. 321T.K. Hei, H. Zhou, V.N. Ivanov, et al.Mechanism of radiation-induced bystander effects: a unifying modelJ Pharm Pharmacol, 60 (8) (2008), pp. 943-950, 10.1211/jpp.60.8.0001View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
322. 322K. Ariyoshi, T. Miura, K. Kasai, et al.Radiation-induced bystander effect is mediated by mitochondrial DNA in exosome-like vesiclesSci Rep, 9 (1) (2019), p. 9103, 10.1038/s41598-019-45669-zView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
323. 323H. Zhou, V.N. Ivanov, Y.C. Lien, et al.Mitochondrial function and nuclear factor-kappaB-mediated signaling in radiation-induced bystander effectsCancer Res, 68 (7) (2008), pp. 2233-2240, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5278View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
324. 324S. Rajendran, S.H. Harrison, R.A. Thomas, et al.The role of mitochondria in the radiation-induced bystander effect in human lymphoblastoid cellsRadiat Res, 175 (2) (2011), pp. 159-171, 10.1667/rr2296.1View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
325. 325M.R. Jain, M. Li, W. Chen, et al.In vivo space radiation-induced non-targeted responses: late effects on molecular signaling in mitochondriaCurr Mol Pharmacol, 4 (2) (2011), pp. 106-114, 10.2174/1874467211104020106View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
326. 326C. Mothersill, F. Lyng, C. Seymour, et al.Genetic factors influencing bystander signaling in murine bladder epithelium after low-dose irradiation in vivoRadiat Res, 163 (4) (2005), pp. 391-399, 10.1667/rr3320View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
327. 327F.M. Lyng, C.B. Seymour, C. MothersillEarly events in the apoptotic cascade initiated in cells treated with medium from the progeny of irradiated cellsRadiat Prot Dosim, 99 (1-4) (2002), pp. 169-172, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006753View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
328. 328H. Klammer, E. Mladenov, F. Li, et al.Bystander effects as manifestation of intercellular communication of DNA damage and of the cellular oxidative statusCancer Lett, 356 (1) (2015), pp. 58-71, 10.1016/j.canlet.2013.12.017View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
329. 329S. Gorman, E. Fox, D. O’Donoghue, et al.Mitochondrial mutagenesis induced by tumor-specific radiation bystander effectsJ Mol Med (Berl)., 88 (7) (2010), pp. 701-708, 10.1007/s00109-010-0616-3View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
330. 330C. Mothersill, C. SeymourLow dose radiation mechanisms: the certainty of uncertaintyMutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen, 876–877 (2022), Article 503451, 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2022.503451View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
331. 331H.G. Zhang, P. Cao, Y. Teng, et al.Isolation, identification, and characterization of novel nanovesiclesOncotarget, 7 (27) (2016), pp. 41346-41362, 10.18632/oncotarget.9325View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
332. 332A. Al-Mayah, S. Bright, K. Chapman, et al.The non-targeted effects of radiation are perpetuated by exosomesMutat Res, 772 (2015), pp. 38-45, 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2014.12.007View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
333. 333A.A. Farooqi, N.N. Desai, M.Z. Qureshi, et al.Exosome biogenesis, bioactivities and functions as new delivery systems of natural compoundsBiotechnol Adv, 36 (1) (2018), pp. 328-334, 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2017.12.010View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
334. 334L. Wu, X. Zhang, B. Zhang, et al.Exosomes derived from gastric cancer cells activate NF-κB pathway in macrophages to promote cancer progressionTumour Biol, 37 (9) (2016), pp. 12169-12180, 10.1007/s13277-016-5071-5View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
335. 335Y. Du, S. Du, L. Liu, et al.Radiation-induced bystander effect can be transmitted through exosomes using miRNAs as effector moleculesRadiat Res, 194 (1) (2020), pp. 89-100, 10.1667/RADE-20-00019.1View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
336. 336S. Mathivanan, H. Ji, R.J. SimpsonExosomes: extracellular organelles important in intercellular communicationJ Proteomics, 73 (10) (2010), pp. 1907-1920, 10.1016/j.jprot.2010.06.006View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
337. 337U. Aypar, W.F. Morgan, J.E. BaulchRadiation-induced epigenetic alterations after low and high LET irradiationsMutat Res, 707 (1-2) (2011), pp. 24-33, 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2010.12.003View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
338. 338T. Szatmári, D. Kis, E.N. Bogdándi, et al.Extracellular vesicles mediate radiation-induced systemic bystander signals in the bone marrow and spleenFront Immunol, 8 (2017), p. 347, 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00347View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
339. 339O. Kovalchuk, F.J. Zemp, J.N. Filkowski, et al.microRNAome changes in bystander three-dimensional human tissue models suggest priming of apoptotic pathwaysCarcinogenesis, 31 (10) (2010), pp. 1882-1888, 10.1093/carcin/bgq119View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
340. 340J.S. Dickey, F.J. Zemp, O.A. Martin, et al.The role of miRNA in the direct and indirect effects of ionizing radiationRadiat Environ Biophys, 50 (4) (2011), pp. 491-499, 10.1007/s00411-011-0386-5View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
341. 341M.A. Chaudhry, R.A. OmaruddinDifferential regulation of microRNA expression in irradiated and bystander cellsMol Biol (Mosk), 46 (4) (2012), pp. 634-643View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
342. 342S. Xu, N. Ding, H. Pei, et al.MiR-21 is involved in radiation-induced bystander effectsRNA Biol, 11 (9) (2014), pp. 1161-1170, 10.4161/rna.34380View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
343. 343W.Q. Tian, X.M. Yin, L.X. Wang, et al.The key role of miR-21-regulated SOD₂ in the medium-mediated bystander responses in human fibroblasts induced by α-irradiated keratinocytesMutat Res, 780 (2015), pp. 77-85, 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2015.08.003View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
344. 344N. Ni, W. Ma, Y. Tao, et al.Exosomal MiR-769-5p exacerbates ultraviolet-induced bystander effect by targeting TGFBR1Front Physiol, 11 (2020), Article 603081, 10.3389/fphys.2020.603081View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
345. 345S. Jokar, I.A. Marques, S. Khazaei, et al.The footprint of exosomes in the radiation-induced bystander effectsBioengineering (Basel), 9 (6) (2022), p. 243, 10.3390/bioengineering9060243View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
346. 346M. Song, Y. Wang, Z.F. Shang, et al.Bystander autophagy mediated by radiation-induced exosomal miR-7-5p in non-targeted human bronchial epithelial cellsSci Rep, 6 (2016), Article 30165, 10.1038/srep30165View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
347. 347S. Cai, G.S. Shi, H.Y. Cheng, et al.Exosomal miR-7 mediates bystander autophagy in lung after focal brain irradiation in miceInt J Biol Sci, 13 (10) (2017), pp. 1287-1296, 10.7150/ijbs.18890View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
348. 348J. Albanese, N. DainiakIonizing radiation alters Fas antigen ligand at the cell surface and on exfoliated plasma membrane-derived vesicles: implications for apoptosis and intercellular signalingRadiat Res, 153 (1) (2000), pp. 49-61, 10.1667/0033-7587(2000)153[0049:irafal]2.0.co;2View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
349. 349S. Xu, J. Wang, N. Ding, et al.Exosome-mediated microRNA transfer plays a role in radiation-induced bystander effectRNA Biol, 12 (12) (2015), pp. 1355-1363, 10.1080/15476286.2015.1100795View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
350. 350K.K. Jella, S. Rani, L. O’Driscoll, et al.Exosomes are involved in mediating radiation induced bystander signaling in human keratinocyte cellsRadiat Res, 181 (2) (2014), pp. 138-145, 10.1667/RR13337.1Google Scholar
351. 351J. Albanese, N. DainiakModulation of intercellular communication mediated at the cell surface and on extracellular, plasma membrane-derived vesicles by ionizing radiationExp Hematol, 31 (6) (2003), pp. 455-464, 10.1016/s0301-472x(03)00050-xView PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
352. 352A. Lo Cicero, C. Delevoye, F. Gilles-Marsens, et al.Exosomes released by keratinocytes modulate melanocyte pigmentationNat Commun, 6 (2015), p. 7506, 10.1038/ncomms8506Google Scholar
353. 353J. Wang, W. Ma, C. Si, et al.Exosome-mediated miR-4655-3p contributes to UV radiation-induced bystander effectsExp Cell Res, 418 (1) (2022), Article 113247, 10.1016/j.yexcr.2022.113247View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
354. 354J. Cohen, N.T.K. Vo, D.R. Chettle, et al.Quantifying biophoton emissions from human cells directly exposed to low-dose gamma radiationDose Response, 18 (2) (2020), pp. 1-7, 10.1177/1559325820926763Google Scholar
355. 355K. Takano, A. Hachiya, D. Murase, et al.Quantitative changes in the secretion of exosomes from keratinocytes homeostatically regulate skin pigmentation in a paracrine mannerJ Dermatol, 47 (3) (2020), pp. 265-276, 10.1111/1346-8138.15202View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
356. 356M. Buonanno, G. Gonon, B.N. Pandey, et al.The intercellular communications mediating radiation-induced bystander effects and their relevance to environmental, occupational, and therapeutic exposuresInt J Radiat Biol, 99 (6) (2023), pp. 964-982, 10.1080/09553002.2022.2078006View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
357. 357A. Liebert, W. Capon, V. Pang, et al.Photophysical mechanisms of photobiomodulation therapy as precision medicineBiomedicines, 11 (2) (2023), p. 237, 10.3390/biomedicines11020237View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
358. 358L. Gopinathan, C. GopinathanIonizing radiation-induced cancer: perplexities of the bystander effectEcancermedicalscience, 17 (2023), p. 1579, 10.3332/ecancer.2023.1579View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
359. 359G.M. ZhouMechanisms underlying FLASH radiotherapy, a novel way to enlarge the differential responses to ionizing radiation between normal and tumor tissuesRadiat Med Prot, 1 (1) (2020), pp. 35-40, 10.1016/j.radmp.2020.02.002View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
360. 360R. Wang, T. Zhou, W. Liu, et al.Molecular mechanism of bystander effects and related abscopal/cohort effects in cancer therapyOncotarget, 9 (26) (2018), pp. 18637-18647, 10.18632/oncotarget.24746View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
361. X. Zhao, C.L. ShaoRadiotherapy-mediated immunomodulation and anti-tumor abscopal effect combining immune checkpoint blockadeCancers, 12 (10) (2020), p. 2762, 10.3390/cancers12102762View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
362. S.L. Hu, C.L. ShaoResearch progress of radiation induced bystander and abscopal effects in normal tissueRadiat Med Prot, 1 (2) (2020), pp. 69-74, 10.1016/j.radmp.2020.04.001View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
363. E. Daguenet, S. Louati, A.S. Wozny, et al.Radiation-induced bystander and abscopal effects: important lessons from preclinical modelsBr J Cancer, 123 (3) (2020), pp. 339-348, 10.1038/s41416-020-0942-3View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
364. R. Yahyapour, A. Salajegheh, A. Safari, et al.Radiation-induced non-targeted effect and carcinogenesis; implications in clinical radiotherapyJ Biomed Phys Eng, 8 (4) (2018), pp. 435-446View in ScopusGoogle Scholar